Two documents circulating online and purportedly originating from the Ministry of Finance have sparked renewed public debate over the transparency of duty free concessions granted in 2025. The papers, dated early November 2025, outline significant tax waivers approved for several individuals including a former Member of Parliament raising questions about eligibility, oversight, and consistency in government concession policies.
Former MP Listed for 75% Duty Waiver
One of the leaked documents, addressed to former parliamentarian René Baptiste, confirms Cabinet approval for a 75% waiver of Import Duty, Excise Duty, and VAT on a 2021 Jeep Wrangler for personal use.
Though Baptiste no longer holds public office, the letter refers to her using the honorific traditionally reserved for sitting members of Parliament, prompting public speculation about whether former officials can or should receive such concessions.
No policy guidance has yet been provided by the government clarifying whether duty-free approvals for former officeholders fall within established rules – or whether this case represents an exception.
Farmers’ Incentive Programme List Raises New Questions
A second leaked document, labeled “In Cabinet on Wednesday, 5th November, 2025,” lists over a dozen individuals approved for 100% waivers on Port and Customs Storage Charges and 75% waivers on VAT and related duties under the Farmers’ Incentive Programme.
While several of the names appear to be associated with agricultural activity, others do not have a publicly known link to farming. This has led some observers to question whether the programme’s benefits were limited to bona fide farmers or extended beyond the intended beneficiaries.
Transparency Concerns Grow
While duty-free concessions are not unusual in the region, the lack of clarity surrounding how these approvals are granted continues to raise concerns. Without clear, publicly stated criteria or a consistent process, questions naturally arise about fairness and whether all applicants are treated equally. Greater transparency would help strengthen public confidence in how these decisions are made.
The documents referenced were submitted to our newsroom by an external source. Their authenticity has not been independently confirmed. We make no allegations and provide this information for public awareness only.
